SoundExchange’s communications office published a guest blog on KnowTheMusicBiz.com, explaining how a lack of quality metadata costs the music industry millions of dollars in unpayable royalties. Check out the full piece: Lost luggage: How Bad Data Cost Recording Artists and Record Labels Suitcases of Cash
“Imagine you’re at a busy metropolitan airport. The luggage carousel goes around, and people stop by, check the luggage tags, and pick up their belongings. As the day wanes, though, there are still lots of suitcases left on the conveyer belt with no luggage tags and no one to claim them. Now, what if I told you that those suitcases are all filled with cash – stacks of bills totaling millions of dollars – and some of it might be yours.
This is the problem created by the music industry’s awful lack of standardized, quality metadata. Before the late 1990s, copyright law offered no compensation to the recording artists or copyright holders of sound recordings – unlike songwriters and publishers, these creators of music didn’t earn a royalty when their work was used by music services. Now, that loophole in the law has been closed (at least for digital services – AM and FM radio are still unfairly exempt from paying their fair share, but that’s another story). As we discussed in a previous post, the Copyright Office appointed SoundExchange to collect those royalties and distribute them to the artists and owners. Before that happened, no one had an incentive to keep a database of contact information on recording artists – who played on which track, and how to reach them now – or copyright information – which label or artist owned the masters on any track. So when music services began sending royalties to SoundExchange for the tracks they’d played, we faced an enormous challenge…”
Read the rest of this piece at KnowTheMusicBiz.com.
