Categories
Archives
Select Month
- May 2013
- April 2013
- January 2013
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
All Categories
SoundExchange Announces New General Counsel
July 27thSoundExchange announced today that long-time Senior Counsel Colin Rushing will step up to be the nonprofit’s new General Counsel. Rushing will fill the position vacated by Michael Huppe, who took the organizational helm as President earlier this year.
Read MoreRecent report of a "waiver of SoundExchange royalties"
July 21stRecently, a music service claimed in the press to have “a SoundExchange royalty waiver.” To set the record straight, there is no such thing as a “SoundExchange royalty waiver.” SoundExchange doesn’t grant “waivers” of anyone’s obligation to pay royalties: we administer the statutory license provided as a part of federal law.
Moreover, SoundExchange consistently advocates for the value of music. Artists and copyright owners invest tremendous effort and resources in the creation of music, and they deserve to be paid when it is used. Their creative work is the backbone of music services, and we have always resisted claims that services should be permitted to use music for free in the name of “promotion.” Rights owners are of course free to decide if it makes sense to grant royalty waivers in certain circumstances. We believe, however, that the industry is best served in the long run when artists and labels properly share in the benefits of their creations, and not when they are asked to donate those creations to supplement the bottom line of others.
Thus, when a service says that it has a “SoundExchange royalty waiver,” it presumably means that it has decided, for whatever reason, not to rely on the statutory license – it most definitely does not mean that SoundExchange granted a “waiver” of its obligation to pay royalties.
Read More